Connect with us

Latest

Bass is Just Living Its Adolescence… Let’s Evolve! by Igor Saavedra

How many times have you heard phrases like “This is a Classic Bass Technique”, “I like classic basses”, “Electric Bass Tradition”, and a hundred more phrases that are spread over the million articles and notes that have been written in relation with our beloved instrument?

It is important to say that I think that all these quotes are well inspired, and have been intended to show and to express respect for our instrument and its evolution. But if we analyze them more profoundly, they become completely inaccurate.

Paul Tutmarc was in my opinion the creator of the very first Electric Bass. He began our instrument’s history in 1934, building the fretted 30″ scale Audiovox #736 and started to commercialize it on 1935. So, if mathematics doesn’t lie, this year, 2011, the Electric Bass is 77 years old.

Some people prefer to count from the construction of the very first Fender 34″ standard scale fretted Bass, which on 1950 was the first widely commercialized Bass in history. I think we have to be fair with Mr. Tutmarc and give him the deserved credit for being the real inventor of the fretted, electric, solid body and “shoulder strapped” Bass.

Electric Bass and Electric Bassists started the evolution process since those years, merging from the shadows of sound and the dark corners of the stages, and slowly achieving its deserved place on the music scene. Since Jaco, Electric Bass finally proved that it was also capable of being a consistent and convincing solo instrument.

Within the fundamental and standard band/group instruments, Electric Bass is the youngest of them all. Drum Sets, Electric Guitars and Keyboards started their evolution many years before our instrument, and are still evolving. But the most important aspect to mention is that all those instruments, even though they have been experiencing all the technological advances throughout the years like the Electric Bass, have maintained their exact role and function within the band context, and this is exactly how the Electric Bass differentiates itself and stands apart from the others. If we compare what Electric Bass used to be 77 years ago with what it is now in terms of technique, function, sound, role, gravitation, and many more aspects, the differences are outstanding. The reason for this constant and accelerated evolution is very simple indeed, and responds proportionally to the longevity of the Electric Bass.

It would be wiser avoiding terms like “Tradition”, “Classic”, and “Correct”, and changing them for terms like “Commonly”, “Originally”, and “Conventionally”, etc. Those other terms help in promoting involution, fundamentalism and orthodox behaviors that damage creativity, change and the achieving and consolidation of an identity for our instrument…

The most toxic aspect comes when these subliminal ideas contaminate critics, bassists, teachers, and future teachers that will be always assuming that there’s already an “Established Bass Truth”, that they are somehow commissioned to preserve, like in Classic Piano for example which has hundreds of years of evolution, enough time to be related with terms like “Classic” and “Tradition”, (also debatable).

You’ll find people trying to force the application of Double Bass techniques and studies on the Electric Bass, objecting fingerings, sweeping, tapping, chords, number of strings, sound, and soloist role…eventually, refusing to accept any evolution related with the so called “Classicism” of the instrument. And even mort dangerous, classifying every evolution outside from what they consider to be the “Electric Bass Context”

e.g.:  I play an 8 string Bass, so “That’s not a Bass”, Ergo: “I’m not a Bass Player.”

I’ve said it many times…, and maybe it’s a good occasion to repeat it:

“In my opinion, the very essence of the Electric Bass & Electric Bass Playing relays just on the execution concept, and remains intact unless you change it’s fundamental role in music… you can add new roles, but not change the fundamental one”.

See you on the next my friends…, please feel free to comment and share..!!

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Rodrigo Muñoz

    September 12, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    I think it would be a very good idea to always have the name of the instrument always spelled out in its entirety, in this case : Electric Bass, an instrument which is a fusion (in my opinion) of a contrabass and an electric guitar. As a guitarist I have to deal with this all the time, specially here in north america where people play mostly electric guitars and steel strings guitars as opposed to just traditional old fashioned regular guitar (classical or nylon string as they call it in the anglo speaking world) using traditional guitar technique (finger style as they call it here), but this is only important to us musicians, the rest of the world could not care less I’m sure

  2. Igor Saavedra

    Igor Saavedra

    September 12, 2011 at 4:22 pm

    Thanks for writing Rodrigo….,

    I just used the common name we use to define Electric Bass because the words change their meaning through the time. For me the problem nowadays is quite the opposite because If you ask 100 people about what they understand by the instrument named as “Bass”, 90 of them will think about the Electric Bass, and I you want them to think about the Acoustic one you’ll have to either specify “Contrabass” Double Bass” to make yourself understood…, that’s my opinion the main reason why it’s enough to say Bass to define the Electric Bass.

    I think that with the guitar (your case) that’s a little different, because the Acoustic Guitar is a much more recognizable and “spread” instrument compared with the Double Bass…, you can find a “Guitar” in every house and every store (less nylon string ones in the US)…, but not a Double Bass….

    Cheers…!!

    Igor.

  3. Mauricio

    September 13, 2011 at 12:24 am

    Thanks for your insight Igor, i really consider (is not the first time i told you) that, for me the bass is not only play music, you can think about it, i feel there´s a “philosophy” of bass, the way we consider the instrument, the function of electric bass is not defined ,i use to met people that use to think they have the “truth” about it, for example, a lot of people some years ago, use to criticize Anthony Jackson, for his ERB (six strings contrabass guitar), and now, where´s AJ? one of the most amazing bass players in the world, i use to watch some videos of bass players, and there´s a lot of guys that criticizes Yves Carbonne or Jean Baudin for The ERB, i feel this people, can´t accept innovators, whats the problem?…i feel they look more like “Priests” of bass, i dont know what are they caring for…let the bass to grow, later we can sit down and think about what we are doing with it, for now, just “let it be!”

  4. Igor Saavedra

    Igor Saavedra

    September 13, 2011 at 2:35 am

    That’s the idea of the article Mauricio…, thanks for your comment..!!

  5. Myron Bennell Carroll

    September 19, 2011 at 11:27 am

    This article hits it on the head. Well said.

  6. Igor Saavedra

    Igor Saavedra

    September 20, 2011 at 12:00 am

    Thanks Myron…., I’m glad you liked it…, please share it with whoever you want…!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Latest

Trending This Week

Bass Social

September Issue

bass-musician-magazine-for bass players

Platinum VIPS | Gold VIPS
To Top
×
Subscribe to Bass Musician
Expect Cool Bass News